Archive for July, 2008

Monday, July 21, 2008

Levitra Online

My critique of the New York Times article, which reported the results of the latest NYT/CBS News poll, is now posted on The Huffington Post, where I will contribute commentary from time to time.

For other commentary on the issue of the Times article, see Mark Blumenthal’s report here.

  – levitra online

Posted by Posted by David Moore Comments No Comments »

Monday, July 21, 2008

Order Viagra Online

This article was previously posted on Pollster.com. 

In a post on July 10 order viagra online, I suggested the size of the group that Gallup calls “swing voters” was probably a significant under-estimate of the actual proportion of the electorate that is up for grabs.A new CBS/New York Times poll seems to confirm my suspicions order viagra online, reporting the equivalent swing voter group at one and a half times greater than what Gallup reported – 36 percent vs.23 percent respectively. (more…)

Posted by Posted by David Moore Comments No Comments »

Monday, July 14, 2008

Online Viagra

On Thursday online viagra, July 10, USA Today published an analysis of voter intentions that produced “six types of voters” who the paper claims “will decide the presidential election.” The types included: true believers (30 percent of the electorate), up for grabs (18 percent), decided but dissatisfied (16 percent), fired up and favorable (14 percent), firmly decided (12 percent), and skeptical and downbeat (12 percent).[i]

As Mark Blumenthal indicated, this is a fascinating analysis, but how useful is it for understanding the election? (more…)

Posted by Posted by David Moore Comments No Comments »

Thursday, July 10, 2008

Accessrx

In a recent post, Gallup’s Jeff Jones reports that for the first time this election cycle, Gallup has measured the number of “swing voters” in the electorate – accessrx.That’s certainly a step in the right direction, but one might well wonder why it took so long for pollsters to admit that there is a substantial proportion of the public not committed to a candidate. (more…)

Posted by Posted by David Moore Comments No Comments »